<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grundig: Your Customer Service Sucks!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandinfection.com/2009/06/18/grundig-your-customer-service-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandinfection.com/2009/06/18/grundig-your-customer-service-sucks/</link>
	<description>Yipeee! I've got Brand Infection.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:36:34 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nader</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinfection.com/2009/06/18/grundig-your-customer-service-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-16630</link>
		<dc:creator>Nader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandinfection.com/?p=1265#comment-16630</guid>
		<description>You are right Paul, it&#039;s a product line-up issue but in my opinion it also has something to do with making customers happy, e.g. recommending a suitable product from another company even if there is none in the line-up.

A satisfying answer would have been:

We currently don&#039;t have any product in our line-up but would recommend looking at Denon amplifiers that can handle over 100W.

Maybe that is too much to ask but the customer would have a better feeling instead of waiting two weeks for the mentioned answer above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right Paul, it&#8217;s a product line-up issue but in my opinion it also has something to do with making customers happy, e.g. recommending a suitable product from another company even if there is none in the line-up.</p>
<p>A satisfying answer would have been:</p>
<p>We currently don&#8217;t have any product in our line-up but would recommend looking at Denon amplifiers that can handle over 100W.</p>
<p>Maybe that is too much to ask but the customer would have a better feeling instead of waiting two weeks for the mentioned answer above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Salzman</title>
		<link>http://www.brandinfection.com/2009/06/18/grundig-your-customer-service-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-16629</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Salzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandinfection.com/?p=1265#comment-16629</guid>
		<description>Not sure how this is a &quot;customer service&quot; issue.  It&#039;s more like an impotent product line-up issue.  Grundig has sort of been waning for years and hasn&#039;t had a decent line of actual HiFi systems since the early 80&#039;s.  I&#039;m sure these speakers are fantastic--I have a set of original Audioramas from the 70&#039;s when Grundig was one of few speaker manufacturers who made their own parts, e.g. the speakers inside the speaker.  

Nevertheless, I think your headline is a bit misleading, because they truly have nothing in their line that is appropriate for these speakers, so I&#039;m not sure how the response could have been any different.  Perhaps less curt maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how this is a &#8220;customer service&#8221; issue.  It&#8217;s more like an impotent product line-up issue.  Grundig has sort of been waning for years and hasn&#8217;t had a decent line of actual HiFi systems since the early 80&#8217;s.  I&#8217;m sure these speakers are fantastic&#8211;I have a set of original Audioramas from the 70&#8217;s when Grundig was one of few speaker manufacturers who made their own parts, e.g. the speakers inside the speaker.  </p>
<p>Nevertheless, I think your headline is a bit misleading, because they truly have nothing in their line that is appropriate for these speakers, so I&#8217;m not sure how the response could have been any different.  Perhaps less curt maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
