<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Intelligent Video-Advertising For Site Owners</title> <atom:link href="http://www.brandinfection.com/2007/01/05/intelligent-video-advertising-for-site-owners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.brandinfection.com/2007/01/05/intelligent-video-advertising-for-site-owners/</link> <description>Yipeee! I&#039;ve got Brand Infection.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Job Search</title><link>http://www.brandinfection.com/2007/01/05/intelligent-video-advertising-for-site-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-10323</link> <dc:creator>Job Search</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:22:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandinfection.com/2007/01/05/intelligent-video-advertising-for-site-owners/#comment-10323</guid> <description>\With an average of over 40% of campaign clicks coming from identical IP addresses, click fraud should be their #1 priority, not launching new products.I ran four campaigns in the month of July, 2007. The campaigns together had an average of 40% of the clicks coming from identical IP addresses.I spent between $38, and $250 per campaign.I had to really dig around to find out why the campaign were really off. In one case, with a test campaign with a daily cap of $25, Adbrite managed to spend my budget at a daily rate of $2,400. In other words, they burned through my budget in 15 minutes. When asked to address the issue, they wouldn&#039;t. When digging further and finding over 50% of those clicks coming from identical IP addresses, I had to prove it to them, they sent the issue to their &#039;fraud department.&#039;Unless you can track the IP addresses that Adbrite sends you, they won&#039;t admit click fraud.If you decide to use Adbrite, which I think you shouldn&#039;t given the many other second and third tier PCC enignes out there, you will need to have access to your server logs, and prepare a report and even then they won&#039;t refund or even a credit on your money. You actually have to get rather clever to get your money refunded.Adbrite knows about this problem, and when you complain they will send fraud issues their &#039;fraud department&#039; but good luck ever hearing back from them, unless you escalate the issue.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>\With an average of over 40% of campaign clicks coming from identical IP addresses, click fraud should be their #1 priority, not launching new products.</p><p>I ran four campaigns in the month of July, 2007. The campaigns together had an average of 40% of the clicks coming from identical IP addresses.</p><p>I spent between $38, and $250 per campaign.</p><p>I had to really dig around to find out why the campaign were really off. In one case, with a test campaign with a daily cap of $25, Adbrite managed to spend my budget at a daily rate of $2,400. In other words, they burned through my budget in 15 minutes. When asked to address the issue, they wouldn&#8217;t. When digging further and finding over 50% of those clicks coming from identical IP addresses, I had to prove it to them, they sent the issue to their &#8216;fraud department.&#8217;</p><p>Unless you can track the IP addresses that Adbrite sends you, they won&#8217;t admit click fraud.</p><p>If you decide to use Adbrite, which I think you shouldn&#8217;t given the many other second and third tier PCC enignes out there, you will need to have access to your server logs, and prepare a report and even then they won&#8217;t refund or even a credit on your money. You actually have to get rather clever to get your money refunded.</p><p>Adbrite knows about this problem, and when you complain they will send fraud issues their &#8216;fraud department&#8217; but good luck ever hearing back from them, unless you escalate the issue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 28/35 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 427/431 objects using apc

Served from: www.brandinfection.com @ 2012-02-10 20:04:05 -->
